Beliefnet
  
advertisement

Bush's Religion Policy Must Confront U.S. Political Divide


« Prev Page | Next Page »
Page 1 | 2 | 

Print Page

A Republican legislative agenda on religion issues will be of interest with Bush in the White House and Republicans in effective control of both houses of Congress, posited the Religious Action Center's Saperstein.

"We'll see whether they'll try to ram through things of fundamental concern to key constituencies in their party," he said. For instance, the religious right, he claimed, wants "nothing more" than to see what is known as the Istook, or Religious Freedom, amendment (RFA) to the U.S. constitution passed.

Originally introduced in 1997, the RFA would open the door to greater maneuverability in the area of public school prayer.

Christian Legal Society senior legal counsel Kim Colby speculated that "with margins as close as they are in the House and Senate," Istook's amendment, if introduced, would probably not get very far. "I can't see it being given serious attention when there are many other difficult things for [Congress] to deal with. Why go into a fight you would be unlikely to win and one that would be messy?"

In the area of foreign policy, many scholars believe the Clinton administration has done well to integrate religious freedom concerns in America's dealings with other nations, especially in the wake of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom and the position of religious freedom ambassador-at-large, among other structures within the U.S. State Department meant to track and promote religious freedom around the world.

Commission chair Elliott Abrams praised the two annual reports on religious freedom released to date by the State Department as required by the 1998 act. But he said, "We have not as yet been able to integrate our desire to promote religious freedom into foreign policy." U.S. policy toward China, for instance, does not reflect religious freedom concerns at present, he claimed.

In order to expand America's promotion of religious freedom, Abrams argued, Bush's administration will need to bring to the table "a deep personal commitment on the part of leading officials."

Saperstein, who also serves on the commission, contended that an expansion of religion's role in foreign policy would include priorities such as raising the issue of religious freedom systematically in U.S. dealings with other nations; developing a "comprehensive strategy to get other nations to join us;" "getting the [State Department] report into the hands of foreign service officers in other nations; and seeking coalitions to deal with issues in other countries that are problematic."

University of Richmond's Al-Hibri, also founder of Karamah: Muslim Women Lawyers for Human Rights, urged the incoming administration to ensure that a multitude of voices are included in dialogue and fact-finding about international religious freedom issues and pertinent policy-making decisions.

She observed that the Clinton administration had reached out to the American Muslim community in symbolic ways, for instance, initiating some conversation with Muslim leaders. "This is a modest beginning," she offered. "But an administration really concerned could follow up these efforts more substantively, which would be good for America." As the U.S. expands its dealings with other nations over concerns about religious freedom, it is important to be "as balanced in our judgments as we can," offered Doug Johnston, president and founder of the International Center for Religion and Diplomacy in Washington, D.C., even as practices that demand criticism or condemnation present themselves. An incoming administration, he said, should strive to recognize any positive steps countries may be taking. "Other countries don't like being beaten over the head, but it becomes far more palatable if we also recognize any good things they may be doing."

"While it is now accepted that religious freedom is a touchstone of U.S. foreign policy," Johnston argued, "it is incumbent upon policy makers to incorporate more fully in their deliberations religious and other cultural concerns."

Related Features


« Prev Page | Next Page »
Page 1 | 2 | 

Print Page

advertisement
Talk About It

Related Features

more on beliefnet
Click Below for Stories, Opinion, and Discussions
Faiths & Practices | Inspiration | Health | Entertainment | Comfort & Support | Family & Home
Relationships | News & Blogs | Audio/Video | Discussions | Ecards | Prayer Circles | Meditations | Quizzes
Copyright © 2008 Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved.
Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service
and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.